Um site dedicado ao fracasso das predições da teoria da evolução de Darwin

terça-feira, maio 26, 2015

Darwin’s (failed) Predictions – Cornelius G. Hunter – 2015

Excerpt: 

This paper evaluates 23 fundamental (false) predictions of evolutionary theory from a wide range of different categories. The paper begins with a brief introduction to the nature of scientific predictions, and typical concerns evolutionists raise against investigating predictions of evolution. The paper next presents the individual predictions in seven categories: early evolution, evolutionary causes, molecular evolution, common descent, evolutionary phylogenies, evolutionary pathways, and behavior. Finally the conclusion summarizes these various predictions, their implications for evolution’s capacity to explain phenomena,

*Introduction

Why investigate evolution’s false predictions?

Responses to common objections

*Early evolution predictions

The DNA code is not unique

The cell’s fundamental molecules are universal

*Evolutionary causes predictions

Mutations are not adaptive

Embryology and common descent

Competition is greatest between neighbors

*Molecular evolution predictions

Protein evolution

Histone proteins cannot tolerate much change

The molecular clock keeps evolutionary time

*Common descent predictions

The pentadactyl pattern and common descent

Serological tests reveal evolutionary relationships

Biology is not lineage specific

Similar species share similar genes

MicroRNA

*Evolutionary phylogenies predictions

Genomic features are not sporadically distributed

Gene and host phylogenies are congruent

Gene phylogenies are congruent

The species should form an evolutionary tree

*Evolutionary pathways predictions

Complex structures evolved from simpler structures

Structures do not evolve before there is a need for them

Functionally unconstrained DNA is not conserved

Nature does not make leaps

*Behavior

Altruism

Cell death

*Conclusions

What false predictions tell us about evolution